“Imposing on innovators, such as Intel, an obligation to anticipate potential uses of their innovations, to correctly guess which uses will predominate, and then to design their technologies to prevent infringing uses (even if it were technically and practically feasible to do so) would stifle innovation and dramatically increase the cost of such technologies and of the consumer and enterprise products based on those technologies.”

Intel threw its support behind Grokster earlier this month when it submitted the “Amicus Brief” to the Court for Grokster to use in its defence.

On a side note to Intel, I’m sorry for bashing your products, but I’m still going to buy AMD wherever possible.

Link. (Thanks mtekk!)
This also might interest you.