<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Blog of a crazy man Comments</title>
	<link>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com</link>
	<description>Just my random thoughts</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: h2</title>
		<link>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/02/07/copyright-gone-wrong/#comment-100</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:47:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/02/07/copyright-gone-wrong/#comment-100</guid>
					<description>mtekk, I'll bet you say that about everything you don't like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>mtekk, I&#8217;ll bet you say that about everything you don&#8217;t like.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anxiety Therapy Interestee</title>
		<link>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/09/internet-anxiety-disorder/#comment-93</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 21:09:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/09/internet-anxiety-disorder/#comment-93</guid>
					<description>I have a friend from Newfoundland who used to get criticized when he was living in Vancouver for being in the bars every night. Then he spent a year in Dublin --- he no longer thinks he has a drinking problem!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I have a friend from Newfoundland who used to get criticized when he was living in Vancouver for being in the bars every night. Then he spent a year in Dublin &#8212; he no longer thinks he has a drinking problem!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Timothy Karr</title>
		<link>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/15/community-broadband/#comment-92</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 20:07:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/15/community-broadband/#comment-92</guid>
					<description>I'm glad my article, &quot;Is Cheap Broadband Un-American?&quot; is getting such prominent play. It was in the lead slot at SlashDot for most of the day (where it's received more than 700 comments and 10,000 readers), was posted on Common Dreams, Free Press, at the Progressive Trail and linked to by innumerable blogs. However, I wrote it for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inthesetimes.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;In These Times&lt;/a&gt; and posted it on my blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediacitizen.blogspot.com/2005/04/is-cheap-broadband-un-american.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MediaCitizen&lt;/a&gt;. I appreciate the attention, but it seems these other sites, most of whom carried it without asking permission, are basking in the glow of the tens of thousands of readers who were drawn to my report. Meanwhile, the story as it originated on my blog has received less than 200 unique visitors. I’m a sworn citizen of Lawrence L’s Creative Commons. But somehow I am feeling as though I’ve just been royally screwed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m glad my article, &#8220;Is Cheap Broadband Un-American?&#8221; is getting such prominent play. It was in the lead slot at SlashDot for most of the day (where it&#8217;s received more than 700 comments and 10,000 readers), was posted on Common Dreams, Free Press, at the Progressive Trail and linked to by innumerable blogs. However, I wrote it for <a href="http://www.inthesetimes.com" rel="nofollow">In These Times</a> and posted it on my blog <a href="http://mediacitizen.blogspot.com/2005/04/is-cheap-broadband-un-american.html" rel="nofollow">MediaCitizen</a>. I appreciate the attention, but it seems these other sites, most of whom carried it without asking permission, are basking in the glow of the tens of thousands of readers who were drawn to my report. Meanwhile, the story as it originated on my blog has received less than 200 unique visitors. I’m a sworn citizen of Lawrence L’s Creative Commons. But somehow I am feeling as though I’ve just been royally screwed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mtekk</title>
		<link>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/15/community-broadband/#comment-91</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 18:18:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/15/community-broadband/#comment-91</guid>
					<description>i remember reading something like this befor, all i can say is f#@! laws do what you want, the FCC has no power, boost to 'illegal' wattage on your WiMax devices and set up a cheep wireless braudband service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>i remember reading something like this befor, all i can say is f#@! laws do what you want, the FCC has no power, boost to &#8216;illegal&#8217; wattage on your WiMax devices and set up a cheep wireless braudband service.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mtekk</title>
		<link>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/13/intel-won/#comment-90</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:14:09 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/13/intel-won/#comment-90</guid>
					<description>yeah but intel will have some issues with the chips, the first one the Pentium X/EE will have HT technology enabled, but windows isn't very good a schedualing more then two threads to be run at a time, for is just too much for it.

The chips will be hot, two prescotts joined together, that means a new all copper heatsync needs to be used, the current LGA775 Heat synce is huge, I built two LGA775 systems about two weeks ago, they actually don't run too hot but i guess they could be cooler but oh well...

there is a bandwidth issue since not all of the dual core chips will be getting 1066Mhz FSBs, this may not be a problem if the number of &quot;lanes&quot; between the chip and northbridge is doubled, creating something like dual channel memory interleve, then we would need double doual channel interleve to get around a memory bottle neck, or maybe 800Mhz DDR2 would do the trick in a doual channel interleve mode. Then we'll need to have a dual channel interleve sata  raid interface thingy to eliminate a bottleneck there, then we'll need to get more pci-express lanes, so that we can have two video cards in at the same time, in a SLI simmular interface, but both cards getting a full 16 lanes each, instead of 8 lanes each in the Nvidia SLI spec.

Then the only noticable preformance differenc will only be seen in apps that make use of multi threading programs. with 2 cores you get twice the ammound of bandwidth for the same speed (Ghz) and slightly higer latencies, which the Prescotts are nitorisous for a long execution pipeline and slightly higher 'lag' then AMD processors, to reach about an effictive double in performance, but not necessarily.

Still I plan on building a dual core, fully decked out system somethime next year. Two WD raptors 74GB 10,000RPM (the next gen ones comming out later this year with native command queing) and dual channel DDR2, best PCI Express graphics card avalible, Creative Labs Audigy 2 ZS Platnium, possibly a PCI Express version if avalible at the time that i build the box, best Gigabyte mb money can buy, and the list goes on. It'll tie me over with one upgrade for most of my time in college.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>yeah but intel will have some issues with the chips, the first one the Pentium X/EE will have HT technology enabled, but windows isn&#8217;t very good a schedualing more then two threads to be run at a time, for is just too much for it.</p>
	<p>The chips will be hot, two prescotts joined together, that means a new all copper heatsync needs to be used, the current LGA775 Heat synce is huge, I built two LGA775 systems about two weeks ago, they actually don&#8217;t run too hot but i guess they could be cooler but oh well&#8230;</p>
	<p>there is a bandwidth issue since not all of the dual core chips will be getting 1066Mhz FSBs, this may not be a problem if the number of &#8220;lanes&#8221; between the chip and northbridge is doubled, creating something like dual channel memory interleve, then we would need double doual channel interleve to get around a memory bottle neck, or maybe 800Mhz DDR2 would do the trick in a doual channel interleve mode. Then we&#8217;ll need to have a dual channel interleve sata  raid interface thingy to eliminate a bottleneck there, then we&#8217;ll need to get more pci-express lanes, so that we can have two video cards in at the same time, in a SLI simmular interface, but both cards getting a full 16 lanes each, instead of 8 lanes each in the Nvidia SLI spec.</p>
	<p>Then the only noticable preformance differenc will only be seen in apps that make use of multi threading programs. with 2 cores you get twice the ammound of bandwidth for the same speed (Ghz) and slightly higer latencies, which the Prescotts are nitorisous for a long execution pipeline and slightly higher &#8216;lag&#8217; then AMD processors, to reach about an effictive double in performance, but not necessarily.</p>
	<p>Still I plan on building a dual core, fully decked out system somethime next year. Two WD raptors 74GB 10,000RPM (the next gen ones comming out later this year with native command queing) and dual channel DDR2, best PCI Express graphics card avalible, Creative Labs Audigy 2 ZS Platnium, possibly a PCI Express version if avalible at the time that i build the box, best Gigabyte mb money can buy, and the list goes on. It&#8217;ll tie me over with one upgrade for most of my time in college.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Blog of a crazy man  :: Intel won :: April :: 2005</title>
		<link>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/09/dual-core-chips/#comment-89</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 15:07:40 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/09/dual-core-chips/#comment-89</guid>
					<description>[...] k and beat AMD by releasing a full 13 days before AMD&amp;#8217;s planned release date. 	Link. Link to old post.                           Comments &amp;raquo;  The URI to TrackBack this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] k and beat AMD by releasing a full 13 days before AMD&#8217;s planned release date. 	Link. Link to old post.                           Comments &raquo;  The URI to TrackBack this [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mtekk</title>
		<link>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/09/dual-core-chips/#comment-88</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:08:19 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/09/dual-core-chips/#comment-88</guid>
					<description>looks like intel is winning, chips start shipping this week...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>looks like intel is winning, chips start shipping this week&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mtekk</title>
		<link>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/13/bushs-ipod-playlist/#comment-87</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:07:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/13/bushs-ipod-playlist/#comment-87</guid>
					<description>Wow, he has 1 more song on his iPod then i have on my Zen Micro, I bet though that my 249 songs  are of higher quality, bitrate and better rippers, then Dwba's songs. I guess i better use up more then the ~1.1GB that i'm currently using, i already have a bout 15Hrs of music, and I'm finding it rediculous to have a 20GB iPod if my 5GB Zen Micro isn't even full. I probably get better battery life then he does, and faster transferr speeds using my USB1.1 connection vs any iPod on any USB interface, including USB2.0, iPods are dreadfully slow when transferring, and that's from first hand experience with normal iPods and iPod minis. :nod:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wow, he has 1 more song on his iPod then i have on my Zen Micro, I bet though that my 249 songs  are of higher quality, bitrate and better rippers, then Dwba&#8217;s songs. I guess i better use up more then the ~1.1GB that i&#8217;m currently using, i already have a bout 15Hrs of music, and I&#8217;m finding it rediculous to have a 20GB iPod if my 5GB Zen Micro isn&#8217;t even full. I probably get better battery life then he does, and faster transferr speeds using my USB1.1 connection vs any iPod on any USB interface, including USB2.0, iPods are dreadfully slow when transferring, and that&#8217;s from first hand experience with normal iPods and iPod minis. :nod:
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mtekk</title>
		<link>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/09/dual-core-chips/#comment-86</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 19:05:07 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/09/dual-core-chips/#comment-86</guid>
					<description>yeah this is why i'm waiting an extra 2 years befor buliding myself a new box, i want/need a dual core processor. I really don't know if i'd go with Intel or AMD, traditionally I've only built Intel boxes, a total of over 20 Intel boxes, and only one or two AMD boxes.

Oh yeah the difference right now is that intel's dual core will be 'ready' for consumers, eg you and me, in may, AMD's dual core thingy is a server chip.

Now that there is an actual reason for 64bit memory computing, yeah you heard it first here AMD and Intel (along with the powerPC G5 chip) are not true 64Bit processores. Intel's EMT-64 (Enhansed memory technology - 64bit) is the most accurate name for it, they only added enough instructions to handel more then 4GB of RAM and a few 64 bit instructions but not all of them/ the entire processor itsn't able to exicute 64 bit instructions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>yeah this is why i&#8217;m waiting an extra 2 years befor buliding myself a new box, i want/need a dual core processor. I really don&#8217;t know if i&#8217;d go with Intel or AMD, traditionally I&#8217;ve only built Intel boxes, a total of over 20 Intel boxes, and only one or two AMD boxes.</p>
	<p>Oh yeah the difference right now is that intel&#8217;s dual core will be &#8216;ready&#8217; for consumers, eg you and me, in may, AMD&#8217;s dual core thingy is a server chip.</p>
	<p>Now that there is an actual reason for 64bit memory computing, yeah you heard it first here AMD and Intel (along with the powerPC G5 chip) are not true 64Bit processores. Intel&#8217;s EMT-64 (Enhansed memory technology - 64bit) is the most accurate name for it, they only added enough instructions to handel more then 4GB of RAM and a few 64 bit instructions but not all of them/ the entire processor itsn&#8217;t able to exicute 64 bit instructions&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: steve</title>
		<link>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/04/pnumatic-hybrid-electric-vehical/#comment-81</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 20:35:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jmweirick.blogsome.com/2005/04/04/pnumatic-hybrid-electric-vehical/#comment-81</guid>
					<description>Make no mistake laddy, the Pneumatic Hybrid Vehicle will be driven by us Americans   as soon as they get the freakin' thing over here. Especially the way those gas  (petrol) prices are climbing. Cherrio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Make no mistake laddy, the Pneumatic Hybrid Vehicle will be driven by us Americans   as soon as they get the freakin&#8217; thing over here. Especially the way those gas  (petrol) prices are climbing. Cherrio
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
